Monday, February 4, 2013

First Impressions: THE LEGACY OF THE EYE


Our second First Impressions for February comes from Patricia Moussatche. It’s an adult Science Fiction novel called THE LEGACY OF THE EYE.

Catrine blinked as her eyes adjusted to the brightness outside the school building. She should have worn a hat. She glanced at David, who had closed the heavy wood door behind them. Her best friend’s smile shined as bright as the afternoon light. This was the first time either of them had left the school since their enrollment at the age of two. They were both eighteen now, but David looked ready to conquer the galaxy.
“Maybe we should go over your speech one more time,” she said.
His smile dimmed. “We went over it five times on the way here.”
“Four. And you’re still forgetting to mention that the tutors will be traveling to the pupil’s home planet. That’s the whole point of the proposal.”
“Do you want to give the speech?”
Her inside twisted in knots. “No.”
"Then stop fretting. If the council hadn’t liked our idea, they wouldn’t have requested an audience.”
“They probably read the proposal once. You’ve read it a dozen times and you still forget some of the details. I should have made you write it.”
David's smile returned, brighter than ever. “Then it wouldn’t have been perfect.”
Or written at all, she thought.

I gather from the opening page that Catrine and David have an important proposal – maybe something like a doctoral presentation – and although Catrine was the one who wrote it, she and David are partners. David is obviously the one with the public speaking skills, since Catrine’s insides twist at the thought.  He’s better at schmoozing than remembering details. I can only assume that together, their disparate skills blend into a good team.

However, there were a number of things that confused me. As they are leaving the building, the comment is made that this is the first time they’ve left their school in sixteen years. At first, I thought it meant they’d never set foot outside the building, especially since the bright light hurt Catrine’s eyes. On reflection, I’m not sure that was the intended meaning, but it certainly sounded like it. (Could it be true? If so, it needs to have a lot more emphasis in this scene – and they ought to do a lot more standing around, appreciating the sun, rather than simply regret the lack of a hat.)

I also found parts of the conversation hard to follow. David said they went over the speech five times on the way here. But they are leaving a building, not arriving somewhere. Catrine points out that David is still leaving out a key point in his speech, but it took me several tries to understand what she said he left out -- and if this one point was the main purpose of the proposal, how could he forget it?

I also didn’t follow the logic of these lines:

"Then stop fretting. If the council hadn’t liked our idea, they wouldn’t have requested an audience.”
“They probably read the proposal once. You’ve read it a dozen times and you still forget some of the details.”

David’s line is fine. But I don’t get Catrine’s point. Is she saying the council only has a vague idea of their proposal after one reading, but David has even less after a dozen? Kind of insulting to her partner and friend! 

I think it’s fine for Catrine to be nervous and taking it out on David. The fact that he tolerates it so well speaks toward their close friendship! But her lines should be tweaked so we understand her major concern (at least what I think is her concern): David has a speech prepared, but she thinks he is not including some of the details she finds important – and he disagrees.  He’s relying on his gift of gab to win over the council, not piddling details.  I also think we need a better understanding of where they are, what building they are leaving, and where they are going to make the presentation in order to fully understand this scene.

Patricia, thanks for sharing your page with us! I also spotted your query over at QQQE, so I knew the basic premise of your story going in.  Readers, do you have any suggestions for this page?  You can find Patricia over at her website, My Middle Years, and read Marcy Hatch’s critique at Mainewords.

11 comments:

  1. Thanks, Dianne. Left my comments over on Marcy's blog. :)

    ReplyDelete
  2. I agreed with all your points, Dianne. Especially if they really are going outside for the first time. That would be momentous!

    ReplyDelete
  3. You have several interesting observations that I never thought of. My main complaint (left at mainwords) is that I don't feel connected or invested in these characters at all. My personal preference is to have some feeling about the characters rather than the catalyst, which seems to be this proposal.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Whoa. This is a trip - seeing the page after I just did the query.

    Okay, I'll shut up and read it now.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Okay. Now that I've read the page, and the critique, here goes:

    Dianne's covered pretty much everything that tripped me up.

    I too paused in the first paragraph. Especially when you wrote:

    "Her best friend’s smile shined as bright as the afternoon light."

    Knowing your world a little, I wonder if "light" instead of "sun" is on purpose?

    Normally, less description is good in the beginning, because you want to get things moving, but I would like just a bit more, so that I can feel grounded in the scene, and picture their surroundings.

    All that said, I'm intrigued and would read on.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Thanks everyone! I really appreciate the comments.

    It's the first time David and Catrine are leaving the school grounds, not the building. I definitely need to make that clear and add a bit more setting to ground the characters.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I interpreted it as building too and was sort of excited about that idea!

    ReplyDelete
  8. I agree with all of Dianne's comments. If these two were actually being released into the light of day for the first time, they'd be celebrating and screaming, "Free at last!" (Okay, so that one's already been taken, so they could say something else. But they sure wouldn't be as ho-hum about the experience.

    Good start, and if the writer clears up some of the confusing parts, it'll be even BETTER!

    ReplyDelete
  9. I already commented on Marcy's blog about some "big picture" issues, but Dianne did an awesome job of picking up little logic details that I missed. Dianne's a rock star!
    Good luck, Patricia! :-)

    ReplyDelete
  10. Oh this process is cool. This help me with my own work reading it and then the comments on it too.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I think Dianne's comments are spot on and will make and interesting beginning become very compelling to a reader. I left other comments on Marcy's blog, but in rereading was wondering about the word "fretting" rather than "worrying." And perhaps if you said "our speech" it would give us the sense that they're in this together? Will this turn into an attraction between the two characters? If so, I would make David even more charming. It wouldn't take much, I don't think, just a couple different adjectives. Although I do like that Catrine is obviously not impressed.

    ReplyDelete